Home > Future Cell Phones > Dr. George Carlo EMF Cell Phone Dangers Interview

Dr. George Carlo EMF Cell Phone Dangers Interview

2 Dr. George Carlo EMF Cell Phone Dangers Interviewhttp://www.emfnews.org/headset.html
TV Interview with Dr. Carlo (Campbell Live, TV3)
Dr. Carlo talks about the cell phone industry's marketing towards children and the epidemic projections from cell phone use.George Carlo and Martin Schram are aiming to become information-age Ralph Naders. They ask a question that ought to concern America's 103 million mobile phone users, as well as those who merely come within earshot of these popular devices: Is the wireless future a threat to public health? "Visit any public building, college classroom, courthouse, or commuter train, and look around: You'll see people using not just wireless phones but also wireless laptop computers and miniature palm tops," write Carlo and Schram. "What you won't see are the microwaves that are criss-crossing a confined space where a number of people who are not even using these instruments are bombarded by these waves." It sounds creepy. And Carlo, an epidemiologist who once oversaw a multimillion-dollar research project on health for the cellular industry, believes the news is not good: there may be a link between cell phone use and brain tumors. The research is not conclusive, but Carlo and Schram think it's disturbing enough to warrant government action. Needless to say, the industry that once backed Carlo's work now considers him persona non grata.
Due largely to Carlo's coauthorship, Cell Phones is unavoidably a one-sided story. Key business figures didn't agree to interviews. In fact, this might have been a better book if it were written by Schram, with Carlo as one of several major characters rather than a collaborator. Then again, it would lack the passionate advocacy that will draw many readers to it. And even the most skeptical may want to take a few of the simple safety precautions the authors recommend in a concluding chapter, such as wearing a headset or earpiece when using a cell phone, in order to keep a distance from the radiation-emitting antennae. One look at the x-ray photos reproduced in the book, which show how radiation easily penetrates skulls, will give even the most impervious observer second thoughts. One thing is probably certain: This book is a harbinger of litigation. If Carlo and Schram are correct about their concerns, the cellular industry--as unbelievable as it sounds--may go the way of Big Tobacco. --John J. Miller --This text refers to the Hardcover edition.

From Publishers Weekly
In 1993, when the cell phone industry's chief lobbyist hired epidemiologist and pathologist Carlo to refute claims that cell phones, which had never been subjected to premarket testing, cause cancer, no one thought he would discover otherwise. But after six years of exhaustive analysis and scrupulous peer review, the results proved, according to this report, that radiation from a cell phone's antenna can cause the formation of micronuclei red flags for cancer in the brain. Children in particular are more susceptible to the radiation than adults. Carlo reported his findings to the industry and the FDA and advocated for continued research, but both parties still maintain that cell phones are safe. Here, Carlo and syndicated columnist Schram retrace Carlo's scientific undertaking and what they cast as a sinister web of corporate greed and masterful PR "spin" that choked his efforts. Schram provides the primary narrative, with Carlo's insights and recollections scattered throughout, a format that grows repetitive. Despite the captivating story, many consumers won't want to slog through the detailed scientific explanations to get to the bottom-line safety recommendations. Journalists, policymakers and consumer advocacy groups, however, will find this no-holds-barred book extraordinarily informative as they continue investigations of the industry. Agent, Ronald L. Goldfarb.
http://www.emfnews.org/qlinks.html

Duration : 0:5:50




Related Blogs

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  1. countgrishnuts
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #1

    0:38 He is the most …
    0:38 He is the most interesting man in the world…

  2. hplaserjet2001
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #2

    Part 3: “It’s found …
    Part 3: “It’s found in a number of adult tumours of all types and even breast cancer. They are isolating this SV40 virus and the surprise was it seems to have past through generations. In other words, people who got the original [polio] vaccine, now it’s in their children and in their grandchildren and there is no way to remove this virus. It’s just passing through millions and millions of people. What else is in the vaccine that we don’t know about?” -Dr Russell Blaylock

  3. hplaserjet2001
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #3

    Part 2: “…for …
    Part 2: “…for your life but for generations, it’s past down through generations. That’s what happened with SV40 and the polio vaccine. It is estimated now in the scientific literature that over 100 million people in the world were contaminated with the SV40 cancer causing virus. They are now finding this cancer causing virus in pediatric brain tumours as a cause of terrible tumours in small children and even in adults….” -Dr Russell Blaylock

  4. hplaserjet2001
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #4

    Part 1: “We’re …
    Part 1: “We’re finding a lot of these vaccines are heavily contaminated, even Maurice Hilleman who was the #1 vaccine expert in the world who worked for Merck Pharmaceutical, he admitted in an interview that there was no way to get these viruses out of there and that many of the earlier vaccines were heavily contaminated with very dangerous viruses. Once that virus is injected in you, you can’t get it out, it’s there not just there…” -Dr Russell Blaylock

  5. hplaserjet2001
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #5

    @BurntPineapple


    @BurntPineapple

    Most cancers are caused by viruses.

    In the 1970s, the World Health Organization introduced AIDs into Africa via a small pox vaccine program and the NYC male gay population via a vaccine program. Salk’s polio vaccine contained a live SV40 cancer virus, which was given to millions in the 1950s. SV40 is a stealth cancer virus that is giving millions cancer, as well as children and grandchildren of people who received Salk’s polio vaccine.

  6. hplaserjet2001
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #6

    @BurntPineapple


    @BurntPineapple

    Part 3: The end result was that more than 3 million women in the Philippines are no longer able to have children. This forced sterilization continues to occur in many countries and is part of the UN’s Agenda 21. According to WHO records, this same depopulation strategy was used in vaccines given to African women starting in 1985 to “eliminate 150 million excess sub Saharan Africans.

  7. hplaserjet2001
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #7

    @BurntPineapple


    @BurntPineapple

    Part 2: When hCG is introduced into the body with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies are formed against tetanus and hCG. The body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and produces anti-hCG antibodies which attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG that naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.

  8. hplaserjet2001
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #8

    @BurntPineapple


    @BurntPineapple

    Part 1: In the 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) conducted vaccination campaigns against tetanus in several countries, including Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. In 1994, the Comite Pro Vida de Mexico became suspicious of the anti-tetanus campaign. The Comite obtained several vials of the vaccine that were analyzed by chemists. Some vials contained human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy.

  9. aceshelia
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #9

    I have it thats why …
    I have it thats why Im here..looking for info

  10. EMRinformation
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #10

    Trustworthy top …
    Trustworthy top rated studies shows that cell phone radiation / EMR has a long list of biological negative effects.
    A lot of studies payed by the teleindustry says “no risks”. (Surprised?)
    For a recent example see this video on my channel:
    INTERPHONE: A reliable study on cell phone risks?

    Spread the massage!

  11. EMRinformation
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #11

    Trustworthy top …
    Trustworthy top rated studies shows that cell phone radiation / EMR has a long list of biological negative effects.
    A lot of studies payed by the teleindustry says “no risks”. (Surprised?)
    For a recent example see this video on my channel:
    INTERPHONE: A reliable study on cell phone risks?

    Spread the massage!

  12. exposefraud
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #12

    More drivel from …
    More drivel from the people wanting to SELL you the latest SCAM item to protect you from your dangerous cell phone.

    For a more RATIONAL view GOOGLE:
    Skeptic » eSkeptic » Wednesday, June 9th, 2010
    “Do cell phones cause cancer?”

  13. davesvideos
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #13

    Cell phone use by …
    Cell phone use by children is being warned against all around the globe.

    English leaders have warned that children should only use cell phones in emergencies.

    The French government has warned its citizens to reduce children’s telephone calls to no more than six minutes.

    In Japan, it is now illegal to use a cell phone on a train, due to concerns of second hand radiation.
    Germany, Belgium, Israel, and India are also advising children limit their use of cell phones.

  14. BurntPineapple
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #14

    @TinfishUK not all …
    @TinfishUK not all of those things give you cancer. Too much of anything is bad for you

  15. Truthrightnow7
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #15

    I use to talk on a …
    I use to talk on a flip phone and the phone would get hot below my cheek near my mouth and I started having some pain after almost four years, I am now having the two teeth that was under my skin where the phone would get hot moving and the dentist does not know why.

  16. irieCmon7
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #16

    “untouchables” huh. …
    “untouchables” huh………. its a shame how ppl rely so much on cell technology while all these e.l.f. and other invisible waves frying us slowly…..

  17. backtonature01
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #17

    I’ve been noticing …
    I’ve been noticing a dramatic change in people’s speaking ability. sometimes it seems like they’re struggling tremendously just to pull a few words outta their ass. and its usually in people who are constantly on their cell phones. I have no doubts its causing some damage to their brain.

  18. exposefraud
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #18

    Nice try but no …
    Nice try but no cigar.
    The popcorn video was a viral video hoax.

  19. warriorforthelight
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #19

    True but they are …
    True but they are convenient and i could do without but i doubt i’d want to

  20. FuiFuiMIKE
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #20

    john campbell has …
    john campbell has an ego problem. he makes the news about him, rather than the story. i cant watch this at all.

  21. rorysparrow1
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #21

    I’d like to add …
    I’d like to add that I can think of many examples of products that we’ve been persuaded by the media into BELIEVING that we really NEED. Well, if I didn’t NEED a certain product before it was INVENTED, then why would I suddenly have a need for that product NOW? Think about it! It makes sense.

  22. rorysparrow1
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #22

    Some of us MIGHT …
    Some of us MIGHT give up our cell phones….. heck, I went most of my life without one. They weren’t a necessity THEN. Why should they be a necessity NOW just because they’ve been invented and are available. That’s what marketing and advertising companies specialize in……… making us THINK that something that they SELL is a NECESSITY, whereas in reality, we could do quite well without them.

  23. amerenio
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #23

    I have gotten …
    I have gotten throbbing, migraine like headaches from using cell phones. It happened the first time I used one and the last time I used one…and yes,the headache ended when I finished the call.

  24. hlkovach8989
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #24

    its never to late …
    its never to late to be healthy…i dont think any of us would give up our phones but there is safety procautions

  25. THeLasTFulLShoW
    August 6th, 2010 at 06:30 | #25

    nice vid, check out …
    nice vid, check out this new cellphones
    brandnewphones[dot]info

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Security Code: